Just making the rounds and re-checking this little bugger. You've got to take a look at this ballot that was sent out. It's on page 4 and is a real eye opener. It appears that Larry is going out on a limb here coming up with all veins of the bizarre and unfortunate. At the same time he's looking for a vote of confidence that he can vote as he sees fit. I'm telling you this is from the land of the bizzare.
http://wbcci12.org/norcal/may07.pdfLarry -- where is the option of:
Should we just vote to kill this amendment and not readdress it until the IBT conducts a full membership survey presenting some facts as to why anything should be done?
There's the one you're missing -- there's the option that should rise to the top. Kill this motion -- it's baseless and not defendable. THEN form a 5 person, 4 TT owners and 1 MoHo owner committee, chaired by a TT owner member, and go out and have a real professional survey composed, mailed, and tallied by a University statistics department. THEY should be able to present a real case for action or not!
They should be able to hone in on the sensible solution -- that one that outright escapes the mere thoughts of the IBT...