Well that would likely be that as a NON-Member, moderating what was supposed to be a MEMBERS forum, this one doesn't have a clue as to what club related facts would be.
The clueless, the ignorant, are continually just too happy with their own situations.
WE provide facts here that even club leadership can't bring themselves to divulge to the membership. ~$86,000 versus the REAL HARD FACT $125K that leadership declined to reveal to the membership. Never mind what small insignificant facts a non-member, moderating what was supposed to be a CLUB forum (IT is NOT), might possess...
http://savewally.org/?p=399I especially liked the quote:
"I am currently not a member, but have been considering it if the changes I see continue."What kind of conscious disconnect could possibly be taking place here? You make a conscious decision to go moderate what should be a club forum, but you haven't been convinced to join the club? HELLO? HELLO!
"I was reluctant, but figured since they made such a bold step, I would try."How many days was that forum open before Twink
reluctantly became a moderator there?

Reluctant my ASS -- you couldn't beat a faster path to that forum and a moderator's position, if he had set the damned thing up himself.
I think lil Twink should take a lesson right out of the Greggy Weggy book of WBCCI Stunts and Tricks. Lil Twink should sign up today to become a member just so that he can file a grievance against ME tomorrow... WBCCI leadership has no clue how to deal with non-members filing grievances, come one -- come all. Hell if you can moderate a joke of a club forum and not be a member, you certainly should have the right to file a grievance as a non-member, shouldn't you?
Just another side-affect of international leadership not having a CLUE as to what they've implemented there...I remember, and can pull the quote where the ECC stated that the forum would be moderated by CLUB MEMBERS, yet not much of what the ECC stated when presenting this fiasco to leadership has played out in REALITY...
Oh, and hey TWINK -- some other missing facts in your vernacular -- we don't moderate here -- never have. We don't employ deliberately deceptive routines to frustrate those that would like to view what goes on here, to participate here. We don't SNOOP into members private messages here, and we're not trying to leverage anything for our "personal gain" here.
WE are watching a 55 year old historic club DIE because the methods and procedures employed by OUR club maintain a comfy travel style for those that purport to be leading this club. I guess this was done as these 'leaders' were to tend to the business of consistent growth and profitability. Problem is that decades of OUR leadership have produced a near 30 year continual streak of lower annual membership numbers, and now, operating in the red in ever increasing numbers, approaching (if not exceeding [Jan Mid-Winter tally]) $100,000.00 a year.
There's no defending that FAILURE, and there's no defending the FAILURE that those new V-A forums (pretending to be a club forum) ARE. They're not in the best interests of the club, its membership, and it is HIGHLY INSULTING that they would put a non-member (YOU) in a position of authority there.
Somebody needs to wake up at the top levels of the club. Rip Van Winkle didn't suck up $125,000.00 a year while he was sleeping -- how come we got suckered?